Development Assistant SuiteDevelopment, valuation and decision tools

Comparable & Benchmarking

Create a transparent market-evidence schedule, normalize each observation and reconcile an adopted benchmark with explicit judgement.

Saved in this browser

1. Basis of analysis

Define the subject and the common basis before entering evidence.

Evidence first

2. Adjustment criteria

Positive adjustment means the comparable is inferior to the subject; negative means superior.

#CriterionPurpose
1Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
2Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
3Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
4Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
5Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
6Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
7Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
8Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.
9Explain market difference and adjustment basis in every comparable.

3. Market evidence & adjustments

Retain the source, date, reliability and rationale so another reviewer can follow the conclusion.

Comparable A

Total adjustment+13.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 3,175 / m² land

Comparable B

Total adjustment+12.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 3,002 / m² land

Comparable C

Total adjustment+17.0%Adjusted rate: EGP 2,698 / m² land

4. Reconciliation schedule

Adjusted evidence is weighted only after checking its relevance and reliability.

Report output
EvidenceSourceUnadjusted / m² landTotal adj.Adjusted / m² landWeight
Comparable A
Primary corridor		Registered transaction
Reliability 5/5		EGP 2,810+13.0%EGP 3,17540.0%
Comparable B
Adjacent district		Verified offer
Reliability 4/5		EGP 2,680+12.0%EGP 3,00235.0%
Comparable C
Secondary corridor		Broker evidence
Reliability 3/5		EGP 2,306+17.0%EGP 2,69825.0%
Total normalized weighting100.0%
Development Assistant SuiteDevelopment, valuation and decision tools

Comparable & Benchmarking Report

North Coast Land Benchmark

Land Market Evidence

Adopted benchmark: EGP 2,995 per m² land
3 comparablesEGPPrepared for decision review
Mina Nady Farhan - Development ManagerConfidential
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Executive conclusion

Market Evidence Reconciliation

The adopted benchmark reflects the normalized and adjusted evidence entered, weighted for relevance and reliability.
EGP 2,995per m² land
EGP 3,002adjusted rate
EGP 2,698
EGP 3,175

Conclusion

Adopted rateEGP 2,995 per m² land. The conclusion should be reviewed if evidence reliability, transaction terms or adjustment rationale changes.

The weighting is normalized to 100%. Higher weight should be reserved for evidence that is recent, verified, similar and based on comparable transaction terms.

Methodology

  • Normalize consideration to a common currency and comparison unit.
  • Apply transparent market, location, physical and commercial adjustments.
  • Use a positive adjustment where the comparable is inferior to the subject.
  • Reconcile adjusted evidence using relevance and reliability weights.

Comparable A

EGP 3,175 / m² land

Primary corridor
Registered transaction
Reliability 5/5

Comparable B

EGP 3,002 / m² land

Adjacent district
Verified offer
Reliability 4/5

Comparable C

EGP 2,698 / m² land

Secondary corridor
Broker evidence
Reliability 3/5

Mina Nady Farhan - Development ManagerConfidentialPage 2
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Evidence schedule

Adjusted Comparable Evidence

All evidence is shown on the same comparison basis. Total adjustment is the sum of the stated criterion adjustments.
EvidenceSource / dateConsiderationAreaBase / m² landTotal adj.Adjusted / m² landWeight
Comparable A
Primary corridor		Registered transaction
2026-04-15 / Reliability 5/5		EGP 118,000,00042,000EGP 2,810+13.0%EGP 3,17540.0%
Comparable B
Adjacent district		Verified offer
2026-06-01 / Reliability 4/5		EGP 134,000,00050,000EGP 2,680+12.0%EGP 3,00235.0%
Comparable C
Secondary corridor		Broker evidence
2026-07-12 / Reliability 3/5		EGP 83,000,00036,000EGP 2,306+17.0%EGP 2,69825.0%
Normalized reconciliation weight100.0%
Evidence hierarchyRegistered or completed transactions normally carry more weight than unverified offers or broker opinions, subject to relevance, date and comparability.
Mina Nady Farhan - Development ManagerConfidentialPage 3
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Adjustment audit

Comparable A & Comparable B

Each material adjustment should be supported by a concise rationale and source.

Comparable A - Total +13.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+3.0%Older evidence adjusted to valuation date
Location-2.0%Rationale required
Site area+2.0%Rationale required
Planning / FAR+5.0%Subject has stronger planning potential
Frontage / coastline+0.0%No adjustment
Infrastructure+1.0%Rationale required
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+4.0%Comparable had less favorable terms
Total adjustment+13.0%EGP 3,175 / m² land

Comparable B - Total +12.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+1.0%Rationale required
Location+4.0%Inferior micro-location
Site area+0.0%No adjustment
Planning / FAR+2.0%Rationale required
Frontage / coastline+3.0%Subject frontage is superior
Infrastructure+0.0%No adjustment
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+2.0%Rationale required
Total adjustment+12.0%EGP 3,002 / m² land
Mina Nady Farhan - Development ManagerConfidentialPage 4
North Coast Land BenchmarkComparable & Benchmarking Report

Adjustment audit & reconciliation

Comparable C, Range & Professional Checks

The final comparable audit is presented beside the reconciled evidence range and issue checks.

Comparable C - Total +17.0%

CriterionAdj.Rationale
Market conditions+0.0%No adjustment
Location+7.0%Secondary location requires upward adjustment
Site area-1.0%Rationale required
Planning / FAR+4.0%Lower permitted density
Frontage / coastline+2.0%Rationale required
Infrastructure+2.0%Rationale required
Topography+0.0%No adjustment
Tenure+0.0%No adjustment
Payment terms+3.0%Rationale required
Total adjustment+17.0%EGP 2,698 / m² land

Adjusted evidence range

3,175
3,002
2,698

Issue checks

Common currency and unitConfirmed
Evidence source recordedConfirmed
Adjustment rationale completeReview required
Weights normalized100.0%
Standards basisThe schedule supports a comparable-method workflow. Formal valuation compliance, investigations and professional judgement remain engagement-specific responsibilities.
Mina Nady Farhan - Development ManagerConfidentialPage 5